Time, dark mater

What if light traveled through space using atoms as the medium for transfer? Space is not empty even in the space between galaxies there are several atoms per cubic meter. For the space between atoms if tiny particles ejected by one atom traveled to other atoms at the speed of light then were absorbed by those atoms and re-emitted again in the same direction at the speed of light, then light would move through space as particles from atom to atom and wave disturbance through the medium as suggested by Einstein when he stated light is both particles and waves. And Heisenberg and Yukawa where convinced there is atom to atom particle exchange in their virtual atom theories of 1927 and 1935. This would begin to explain why light slows down through dense mediums like glass, (more re-emitting and relays) and speeds up again in air and outer space ( less relays). This would explain Michelson and Morleys findings that light is measured at the same speed from all directions in outer space. The speed of light would always be relative to the observer and the atoms around the observer. This is because as light released from a faster moving object, say a distant sun moving toward us, the atoms pass particles and pulse light frequencies to ambient space atoms at the speed of light plus the approaching objects speed, the ambient space atoms absorb the incoming particles but can only re-emit them at the speed of light relative to themselves so a observer surrounded by these ambient atoms would always measure light at the same speed no mater what direction it comes to him from. The observer would how ever see a Doppler shift in the received light. This is do to the ambient atoms receiving particle pulses at the speed of light plus the suns speed, this increases the pulses the ambient atoms receive per second they in turn relay the higher frequency of pulses at the speed of light relative to them selves, a observer sees higher frequency of light shifts, but still at light speeds relative to himself. Youngs' light waves traveling through offset slits experiment could be explained by atom to atom particle relay in that one atom would impart particles to several atoms imparting several more particles to many more atoms and so on, this would allow light passing through a thin slit in a barrier to multiply out enough effecting atoms in the two offset slits of a second barrier where these atoms would absorb and relay particles to more atoms till the light disturbance strike the surface of a screen in a interference pattern. Then there is Einstein thought experiment where you look out the window of a space ship at the speed of light and observe a identical sister ship traveling along side at the same speed but you notice the sister ship has shrunk in length. You call your buddy asking him to look out the window at you and he confirms that your ship has shrunk to. Using the atom to atom transfer idea this would be expected because the light leaving the ship is converted to light speeds relative to ambient space atoms in between the two ship, light reaching the observer on either ship is distorted. Objects not being able to travel faster then light, give relativity people a problem when one talks of several objects moving in different directions at the speed of light. At some point the objects will be traveling faster then the speed of light relative to each other, and the universe cannot move away from these objects at the speed of light simultaneously if we desire to use the objects as stationary references instead of the universe. With atom to atom light transfer this is no problem because objects can travel faster then Lightspeed. Example spaceship traveling any direction in space at near light speed, light inside the ship bounces around inside the ship at light speed from atom to atom plus the ships speed surrounding and carrying the atoms. Light from inside the ship shines out the window into space the moving atoms of the ships window transfers faster then light particle pulses to the first encountered ambient space atoms which increase the light frequency and relay the new light at light speeds relative to themselves. Relativity takes place between atoms to atom transfer and not between objects. What is good is here objects can travel faster then light, just light can not travel faster then light.

Here is another explanation for faster then light encounters. Picture two identical red lights shining back at us from the far end of a long dark tunnel. One stationary, the other mounted on a car moving at some high velocity towards us and we have a very accurate speed of light measuring device. We measure the two light beams' speed and find that they are the same with the light from the moving car now at a higher frequency, yellow in color. How could this be? The answer is that the light emitted by the moving light source only traveled a short distance at a higher speed of light inside the light bulb until it was relayed from the last atom of the lights' glass lens. Then it was absorbed and re-emitted by ambient air atoms at a light speed relative to the tunnel air atoms and observers in the air tunnel’s atoms . The light speed would be the same with the moving light, showing a rise in frequency. If the speeding car had its' dome light on, the light inside the car would be measured by the driver as traveling the speed of light. This light, compared to the stationary light fixed in the tunnel, is traveling at the cars speed faster than the fixed light. A relativity correction takes place between the car and tunnel system atoms which are first encountered. In Einstein relativity the light from the dome light cannot exceed the fixed light Thus, by some unexplained phenomena the entire car system shrinks by an exact amount, so the driver with his shortened ruler, measures the speed of light in the car the same as an observer in the tunnel. We could say the reverse. The car is fixed with the world and the tunnel speeding by, with everything but the car shrinking. With naytrons or u-particles the first speeding tunnel atoms that encounter the stationary car, get struck by naytron particles from the windshields’ glass atoms. These particles are traveling at light speed plus the approaching tunnel atoms’ speed. Tunnel air atoms encounter the light frequency pulses faster and interpret a shorter wavelength which they relay on to all the other high speed tunnel atoms, and the tunnel observer relative to them. Thus, the undiscovered particles work better for reversed relativity. The speed of light is relative to the density of the medium but fixed between the atoms.

There is another atom to atom light transfer occurrence. In atom to atom light transfer light cannot travel through large areas of atom less space. Obviously there are places in the universe and our galaxy that are void of atoms, like dark matter clouds that cover star fields and do not have gravity affects associated with them. If there were no atoms, for atom to atom light transfer then light as we know it would not travel through these areas of space and they would appear to be huge non-gravity objects in space. On the plus side dark matter areas of space would be good places for spaceships to go faster then light speeds because there would be no atoms to push through hitting and slowing the ship. The fringe atoms of a dark mater cloud eject u-particles into the cloud void as quarks and quanta that carry information, these particles travel into the void a distance before the quark ring becomes so large and the u-particles get so far separated there is little chance of striking and collecting onto atomic mater. These u-particles quanta travel at the speed of light across the void of the dark mater clouds and the information they were carrying become so dispersed it is not discernable. If we had a space ship and entered the dark cloud void the atoms of our ship may be in trouble. Because there won’t be enough u-particle collisions to hold them together and they would decay due to atomic depletion, however there are u-particles crossing the void, they are not very close together but if a ship was traveling at light speed it may encounter enough collisions to stop it’s atoms from decaying.

For gravity in space, we have balls of mass in which all atoms are rocketing toward the ball's center with quanta wave fronts radiating from the ball in all directions out into space. As the distance increases from the mass, these waves spread out relayed through local space atoms and then deep space atoms. These waves spread out at the square of their distance, like Newton's gravity force(Sir Isaac Newton, England 1665, published 1687). But unlike Newton's gravity, these quanta waves continue from the A-mass, straight out into space, relaying naytron clouds (quanta) from space atom to space atom at the speed of light because gravity is light or any other EMF until striking a distant B-mass. That mass then receives naytron smoke ring wave fronts passing through from local atoms, producing more quarks on the side toward the A-mass and starts emitting more quanta out its far side. This then starts rocketing the B-mass toward the larger A-mass. This gives gravity the ability to affect things light years away and affect light and EMF itself. When we receive any radiation from a distant star that make us aware of it, then that radiation is bringing relayed quarks to us. These quarks build on one side of our planet continuously, causing quarks on our planet to increase emissions of quark quanta from the areas of the weakest saturation. These areas are opposite of the received particles, and in turn, nudge us with reactions exploding off quanta boson pulses, closer to the star. It should be mentioned here that it is possible in this theory, unlike Newton's theory, for us to be affected by incoming relayed quanta and gravity from extremely distant stars, even though they may not at this moment still exist, and certainly after hundreds of light years, have moved from the position we currently view them at. As the quanta wave front moves out into space and the smoke rings expand, passed by interstellar atoms, it deposits quarks on them, causing these atoms to repeat the quanta wave front emission, opposite the point from which the atoms received it. In this way, one quanta wave front can propagate into billions of quanta wave fronts. This allows us to see a star from infinite points in space. Also, since the interstellar atoms are hit randomly from many stars, they can rearrange their radiation patterns as different quanta bursts in different directions, thereby passing quanta of different stars simultaneously. This multi-tasking could account for the blinking of the stars we see at night. It should be mentioned that light passed through space from atom to atom, as suggested in this theory, can not pass through huge completely atom-less areas of space. Since naytons, if not collided into stable quarks in less then a second, will decay to time, these particles can only travel 186,000 miles into an atomless area of space. This could answer the problems of dark matter gravity effects, which was not adding up for astronomers. Astronomers interpret dark cloud areas covering star fields in space as dark matter blocking the light from the stars behind it from reaching us. But the mass these dark areas represent does not show up as great gravity fields as expected, and in this theory an immense atom-less void would not pass light, acting like a shield which blocks light without affecting gravity. In the undiscovered particle theory, the dark matter areas would not add to the gravity field.

Time;

The loss of naytrons or u-particles from a atomic mass, in the normal decay of atom protons to the universe, is what we term as time. There are two basic types of time. Galactic time, which is the time Einstein talks about and is the overall gradual transfer of naytron mass in the universe, and virtual time which is a living entity's concept of the passage of time. Example: microbes perceive their entire lives in hours, insects' lives in months, animals' lives in years, humans' lives in decades, and trees' lives in centuries. Virtual time may appear unchanged because virtual time depends on the perception of time by a life form or entity. Galactic time is an overall constant and can change greatly from place to place in the universe, such as in areas of space where atom proton particle loss is not replaced, like the dark matter areas of the universe and in the middle of solar bodies where the atoms direct their naytron outputs away from the core. Protons of these atoms are taken out of the flow of particles from their surrounding atoms. The result is naytron depletion. The atom quickly decays all their particles away in a surge of u-particles that nearby atoms pick up and relay as heat. In this case, time passed quickly for these isolated atoms and is how an unknown third nuclear reaction, nuclear depletion, works to heat the cores of planets and suns and is why deep space and the galaxy fringes expel so much heat. In places in the universe where there are large solar bodies and there are more naytrons being collected than the protons of the atoms can expel, the atoms can't decay. Thus, time slows down, and in the case of black holes which are really black stars where the flow of naytrons is extreme, time stops. This is also true in accelerating objects where their atoms are forced to collide with and pass through the output flows of local space atoms, thus forcing the moving object to collect more than the normal naytrons and slowing proton decay and time on the object.

 The E=MC2 formula of Einstein, a system where matter can neither be created or destroyed, can not be complete until time is also taken into consideration. Then, in order to fully describe the universe, time should be added to Einstein's equation as T=1/MC2. The revised formula indicates that matter can neither be created nor destroyed, but changes proportionally into energy and inversely proportionally into time. Thus, when energy or mass increase, time decreases and when energy or mass decrease, then time increases for a object. This allows for the exchange of energy and mass in the universe with time increasing to maintain equilibrium. The MC2 formula means time slows when mass is in acceleration. This advanced formula indicates that the loss of mass or energy in the universe will result in a gain of time. Since loss of naytron particles of a atomic mass causes exchanges from atom to atom at the speed of light, per speed of light, time increases. In some special case naytron particle exchanges, the naytron particle clouds fail to attain the necessary light speed force needed to rebuild stable standard quarks. This results in a smaller speed of light (C2) value. If time (T) remains the same, then the mass (M) increases and will show up as an increase in E (energy), which is basically atomic fusion and fission energy.

 The universe is filled with atomic mater that is constantly decaying, tiny particle by tiny particle. As these atomic masses expel, left over quark naytron particles into local atoms and replenishing their loss of particles, atoms in the universe which would only last for fractions of a second and decay in a flash of heat (naytron output surges), get replenished by other decaying (fast time) atoms in the universe and time for these atoms pass slowly. As galactic time passes, there is less atomic masses in the universe. This is why time proceeds in only one direction as the universe expands . The energy (mass) of a system is always less as time passes. Entropy is the loss of energy and is the result of a system used over time in a universe, continuously losing mass and energy. As an example, dropping a one kilogram steel ball from a three meter height will efficiently bounce back up off of a steel slab less then three meters. The ball will bounce less each time until it stops. There is always a loss of energy and mass in the system because the earth and the universe are expanding and spreading out decreasing available energy and mass as time increases. When events in time occur, the before and after reactions are not equal in mass and energy. Thus, there is always less energy and mass after an event in time on earth. In the same experiment performed under special conditions, such as near a black hole, which are dark stars, or on a space craft traveling near the speed of light, the steel ball would bounce the same height each time and would not stop. At faster than light speeds, the ball may actually bounce higher at each bounce. The universe, while expanding, is losing mass and will continue to until the last naytron of the last quark of the last proton of the last hydrogen atom is gone leaving the space we reside in, totally full of time .

 Reality constants of the stars: Planet cores and suns are heated by a third nuclear reaction involving atomic particle depletion. Solar flares are caused by nuclear fusion of hydrogen isotopes swept up from space, but the sun itself is made up of normal solar matter, super heated by a third unknown nuclear reaction that we call atomic particle depletion, not just hydrogen and helium as predicted by the Hans A Bethe (Cornell University, 1967) theory of nuclear energy production in stars. It is predicted that one hundred tons of space dust fall on the earth each day. One would have to conclude that the sun diameter, being 109 time bigger then earths' diameter, would capture 10,000 times that amount of space matter each day. Over millions of years, one would think that the sun would contain a higher percentage of this space dust than hydrogen and helium. What is missing from Hans Bethe's theory is how the sun attained and maintains fusion heat and what happens in atoms to cause fusion. The undiscovered u-particle theory predicts that the sun is normal space matter, and that the outward flow of elementary particles from the cores of suns and planets, prevent their center atoms from building new quarks to replenish them. This, in turn, causes time to pass quickly for these atoms decaying all their protons, neutrons and electron as u-particle energy. In this same why some outward planets of our solar system exhibit heat energy even thou they are to far away to receive it from the sun. The earths’ core is also a miniature sun capable of supplying us with an unlimited power source.

Space travel: Faster than light space travel is possible. Light can't travel faster than light but man can and will. When we try to push electrons and protons to the speed of light, we do so by supplying them naytrons in a magnetic flux. They absorb the naytrons, build quarks, and expel over-accumulated quarks as naytrons clouds at the speed of light. This matter will never exceed the speed of the particles propelling it. In other words, if I have a jet ski and water can only be pushed through a given hole at 60MPH, no amount of horsepower from a motor will make the jet ski go faster then 60MPH. However, using a experimental high speed jet ski theory of colliding opposite flowing 60MPH streams of water from behind the jet ski, possibly a high percentage of water molecules will bounce off of a deflector plate at 120MPH, allowing us to circumvent this problem. Currently, Fermi labs is colliding opposite traveling proton streams of particles, but one of the streams is anti-protons and upon collision, they are suppose to annihilate each other. In the undiscovered particle theory, anti-matter protons are just protons forced into a stable state and act like heavy electrons colliding with naytron ring clouds, building quarks and then decaying them away in opposite directions of the source. Since anti-protons do not continually emit quanta, as (+)positive protons do, the (-)negative anti-protons rocket toward and seek out (+) positive quanta sources, as do electrons. Unlike electrons, the forward progress would be stopped by the flow of mass of a three quanta ring intersection coming from an atoms' protons. The anti-protons’ large moving mass will continue through the quanta flow colliding with the proton, forming a huge unstable proton that explodes its' quarks away in a wave. Some of the exploded quarks do not possess the speed of light momentum needed to form naytrons into new quarks, so the loose naytrons decay into time in a flash of heat.

There is a lot more that can be said about the undiscovered particle but this is just an informal overview. The undiscovered particle, acting within a few simple rules, can explain time, gravity, light, nuclear reactions, magnets, lasers, and much more. The naytron particles operate as a quanta theory between atomic particles and relativity within the physical world. After searching 25 years for answers, is there a undiscovered particle or not?

Now we have a ball of mass in which all atoms are rocketing toward the center with quanta streams radiating in all directions out into space. As the distance increases from the mass, the chances of a distant mass getting Figure 2

hit by the emitted quanta gets less by the square of that distance like Newton's gravity force (Sir Isaac Newton, England 1665; published 1687). But unlike Newton's gravity these quanta continue from the (A mass), straight out into space relaying from space atom to space atom at the speed of light (because it is light) till striking a distant (B mass ). That mass then gets its atoms, boson coated, producing more quarks on the side toward the (A mass) and starts emitting more quanta out it's far side. This then starts rocketing the (B mass) toward the larger (A mass). This gives gravity the ability to effect things light years away. In effect if we receive any radiation from a distant star that make us aware of it, then that radiation is bringing relayed quarks to us, these quarks build on one side of our planet continuously, and cause quarks on our planet to increase emission of quark quanta from areas of weakest boson saturation. These areas are opposite of the star mass, and intern nudge us with reaction to exploding off quanta boson pulses, closer to that star. It should be mentioned here that it is possible in this theory unlike Newton's theory, for us to be effected now by incoming relayed quanta gravity from extremely distant stars, even through they may not at this moment still exist, and certainly are not still after hundreds of light years in the position we view them in now. as the quanta beam moves out into space and the smoke rings expanding, pass by interstellar atoms, it deposits quarks on them, causing these atoms to repeat the quanta emission, opposite the point from which the atoms received it. In this way one quanta beam can propagate into billions of quanta beams, this allows us to see a star from infinite points in space. Also since the interstellar atoms are hit randomly from many stars they can change their radiation patterns as different quanta bursts reach them from different directions this could account for the blinking of the stars we see at night. The Doppler effect, also fits nicely into the quanta emission GUT in that moving toward the quanta burst would increase the frequency and moving away from a star would decrease the frequency. So red and blue shifts would indicate our direction and speed toward a star. Because the light and other EMF is relayed from space atoms to space atom relative to the observers planet, all light is measured, having the same speed as in the Albert A. Michelson and Edward Morley 1887; attempt to measure changes in the velocity of light produced by motion of earth through space; inability to find such changes, was later interpreted as helping to establish Einstein's special theory of relativity. It should be mentioned here that light passed through space from atom to atom as suggested in this theory, can not pass through huge completely atomless areas of space. This could answer the problems of dark matter mass not adding up for astronomers. Astronomers interpret dark areas in space as dark mater blocking light from the stars behind it from reaching us, but the mass that this must represent does not show up as gravity. but in this theory a great atomless void would not pass light acting like a shield with out effecting gravity, and the mass would add up .

Anti gravity could be possible if a way could be found to cause the atoms of a object to reject the absorbed quanta in the same direction it was received. possibly causing a higher buildup of quirks on the top of an object's atoms could force the objects atoms to emit all quanta beams and quarks opposite their normal direction.

Einstein's theory; (1915, general theory of relativity.) is supported by the Quanta GUT when a ship appears to shrink as its speed increases near the speed of light. This is caused by the way light is relayed and multiplied, as it's moved through space by resident space atoms (which can be a few hydrogen atom, per cubic yard in deep space). As light from a fast moving space ship passes space atoms, the atoms only re-emit parts of the whole picture. This is like taking a full ten inch long picture of the ship and cutting a vertical half inch strip out of it per every inch, then shoving the remaining pieces back to gather. You would see the ship as shorter. Remembering that as light frequency quanta smoke rings, pass by and rub off on ambient space atoms, as they travel across space, they are re-emitted. These atoms re-emit, and mimic the original in coming quanta beams. These beams carry on in the same direction, but are now moving at light speeds relative to the ambient space atoms since they regenerated them. So even though the original light traveled faster then light at first, it is captured and readmitted by resident mater, at their speeds of light, and the light becomes relative to them. So no matter where an observer measures the speed of light from, in space, it will be relative to the resident atoms and observer. Only Doppler's frequency shifts will be noticed because of the increasing or decreasing distances between quanta rings, received by, and relative to the resident atoms. So if this is true then the light coming from a ship traveling near the speed of light is received by ambient space atoms with shorter pulse distances, they translate them into a higher frequency of light but readmit this new high frequency light, at speeds of light relative to themselves.

Picture two identical flash lights shining back at us from the far end of a long dark tunnel. One stationary the other moving at some high velocity toward us and a light speed measuring device. We measure the speed of the two light beams and find they are the same, with the light from the moving flash light now a higher frequency color. How could this be? The answer is that the light emitted by the moving light only traveled a short distance at a higher speed of light till it was relayed from the last atom of the flash lights glass lens, when it was absorbed and re-emitted by ambient air atoms at a light speed relative to the tunnel air and observers. The light speed would be the same with the moving light showing a rise in frequency. So a resident observer notes a fast moving space ship as blue instead of a green space ship, that is twenty feet long instead of it's actual thirty foot length, with no change in the speed of light coming from it.

Using these ideas of what atoms are, and how quanta react with it we will attempt to show that the universe and known phenomenons

can be explained. To do this we need to look back at the big picture. If we accept Hobble's big bang theory. As why all matter seems to be moving apart, and was blasted out from a central point in the universe. Logic would predict that if such immense power was present to set the universe in motion.. Then all elements and isotopes of the universe could have been produced at that time also, and is decaying back to energy quirk by quirk. This matter is now in dense clouds, as it moves out matter in thin areas, starts to be affected by the higher quanta emission from denser cloud areas and start moving them selves in that direction. soon the dense areas pack in collected atoms to join into space masses, These become asteroids, moons, planets ,suns ,solar systems, and galaxies. As these bodies of mass form, collecting as much space matter around them. they are traveling out on trajectories imparted to them by the big bang, Each particle having a unique angle to every other particle. We will call this angle the "tear angle", the angle particles move away from each other on lines from the center of the universe. If gravity didn't exist mater particles would just continue straight out getting further apart with time and look something like quills coming from a porcupine. But since gravity does exist forcing matter toward each other, the matter thinking it's still traveling straight out is actuality orbiting larger masses still maintaining all their tear angles, always moving farther apart. If it weren't for time and the constant expanding of the universe and all atoms and matter in it proportionally, a great amount of energy would be needed to maintain orbits against the tear angle change. This expansion as extremely small as it is, is evident as we observe the moons rotation around the earth and other moons of planets in our solar system. Notice that the moon and planets all orbit pretty much on the same plane. That's because their alinement is with the center of the universe and not with our sun. Further if we study the earth and moon orbits around our sun with time notice that the space bodies as they travel out into the universe, also move apart on their almost parallel tear angle trajectories. As their distance increases their orbits should spiral out away from what they orbit. We do not see this happening, so logically the planets, moon, and sun must be growing in relative size to keep the planet distances the same year to year. So not only is the universe expanding but the planets are expanding in it. If gravity and a central origin did not exist the planets and moons would not need to all lie following in flat plane orbits perpendicular with a line drawn toward the center of the universe from the center of the sun. Further we observe that we in turn orbit with other stars in the milky way galaxy on pretty much that same plane. This could only mean that the vast number of stars, our self and space mater is really aligned to the center of the universe. Further we observe that the universe is expanding not orbiting a central mass. This is more support for Hobble's big bang theory. Observing the moons orbit around our earth we notice it orbits near our earth's equator. This type of orbit could only mean that the noon is orbiting around it's tear angle from the center of the universe, and not the sun. I say this because if it's orbit was connected to the sun it would have to hold an orbit that crossed near the north and south poles of the earth. Instead our moon orbits around our equator.

Einstein is said to have believed the universe expands into space that it produces for it's self. Applying our quanta theory of energy propagating through the universe some new concepts show up. First at the end of the universe all particles in space end so with out particles to relay light even if there were something out there we would not be able to see it. Second as the quirk quanta rings expand out into nothingness they will eventually lose all their quirks to energy through decay, and not take up any space. So this may mean the universe can expand into the same space till all matter turns back to pure energy. Or even shrink as it expands.

 In summary these ideas I have put forth, how ever bazaar they may be to modern day physics, are not that new. Four centuries before Christ a Greek philosopher Democritus believed atoms to be small fundamental particles that rocketed them selves around in empty space. But Aristotle did not see it that way and his greater influence, steered this science in other directions. That was later picked up by Galileo, Bole, Dockyard, Newton, and Maxwell. since then this traditional approach has not been supported well with experimental proofs. It may have taken over two thousand years to come back and take another look at Democritus's first idea of what atoms really were.